Wednesday, November 18, 2015

The Atheist/Unbelief NWO Network #2: Famous Atheist/Freethought Celebrities

I always found Ron Reagan--President Ronald Reagan's son, involvement with the "Freedom From Religion Foundation" to be of interest. It's funny because IFB and right wing evangelical churches see his father Ronald Reagan as some kind of demi-god. Do they know his son went to the opposite side?  Even the folks in my last IFB church constantly praised Ronald Reagan. Surely a father is not responsible for the way a son goes, but these organizations are just as tied in with the powerful and elite.

                                                  [picture cite]
Freedom from Religion Foundation has given an award to multiple celebrities:

Emperor Has No Clothes Award
The Emperor Has No Clothes Award has been awarded by the Foundation since 1999 in recognition of “plain speaking" on the shortcomings of religion by public figures.

Past recipients [see the Freedom From Religion Foundation website]

Many of the famous atheists and unbelievers all mark themselves too. Why would secularists and atheists believe in the concept of "Illumination?" Is this telling us they DO believe in some supernatural world despites their claims?  Anyhow we see them make the same gestures as the other connected types in the new world order. They also have no problem with meeting fellow members of the elite.

Richard Dawkins [picture from Pinterest] Why is he doing a Horus eye in his photograph? He wouldn't believe in Horus either if he's a true atheist.

Is this Bart Erdhman? I tried to find a second copy all over online to confirm.  It looks a LOT like him. It was from a Man of the Year contest in some magazine. Well he is loved by the world isn't he?

One sees the same hand signs among the famous celebrity atheist set as they do among the entertainment celebrities.

Why pay homage to the devil if you don't believe he exists?

Where's that freethinking, questioning mind when it comes to cultural precepts? I guess it disappeared for a few seconds.

George Carlin was more well known for comedy but was known to be a famous atheist too, but if you ever saw one of his videos with far too much cussing, someone could give the guy the "most hand signs flashed" award. He was one of those allowed to expose a few truths, but definitely mixed with lies like disbelief in God.

Christopher Hitchens. Not sure about that hand position but he sure seemed to meet with a lot of movers and shakers. I read at least two of his books. "Know thy enemy" and all that. He seemed very elitist.

[picture source]

Then there was Madalyn Murray O'Hare [warning some mild language warnings and talk against God in this video]

You ever wonder how such a foul mouthed and unattractive woman became so famous? She must have been chosen to fight prayer in school and to help spread atheism on purpose. She didn't rise up based on her own merits, she definitely was chosen and for an agenda.

I followed her articles in the late 1980s as I read the magazine American Atheist. She came across as shrill to me but back then I agreed with her viewpoints.

Today some aspects of her life stand out to me. She tried to defect to Russia with her son. She was the one who filed the case against prayer in school which was won.  Fame came to her easily and she seemed to be a chosen atheist spokesperson within the system. She married basically someone who was a government agent which is definitely a sign of some connections. I don't buy Slate's disagreement with the book UnGodly, it seems to be wall papering over the reality. It is accepted that Richard O'Hair was a government informant of some kind. Even her death was suspicious, as the finances of American Atheist were kept secret and a betraying employee set her up to be murdered as well as her son and granddaughter who worked for the organization.

Madalyn O'Hair definitely had a few screws lose and would have been among the seared, the psychologists perhaps would have used terms like narcissistic personality disorder or sociopath. She hired criminals which helped lead her demise and hid money, one book I read about her murder talked about the endless money laundering she participated in and bilking rich atheists of their estates when they died. She definitely had many questionable involvements and her own involvements with the powerful and was given 300 million dollars by Larry Flynt a then well-known pornographer. Definitely this woman was being promoted and allowed a very public forum while having loads of cash unloaded on her by the powers that be.

So the atheist celebrities work in the same ways the "religious" ones do.


In Christ Alone my hope is found said...

Hey BB, the second picture with the guy throwing the 666/OK sign over the eye looks a lot like Kevin Spacey!

In Christ Alone my hope is found said...

Yeah that's Kevin Spacey for sure!

Anonymous said...

Agree, O'Hair was selected as was Gloria Steinem; - Don

Anonymous said...

Ironic about former president Ronald Reagan's son. Many within our conservative, Republican church with Pentecostal/charismatic folks in the congregation, regard the former president as this great 'man of god who loved a jesus as his own.' It boggles my mind how these churched individuals turn our LORD Jesus into a Republican who blesses republican based regimes and curses the democrats' style of national leadership. Some of the most divisive/reviling types of Christians are those who are conservative Republicans!

So thankful to have "given up politics during the pagan festival of LENT."

Anonymous said...

At first glance, I thought that the first video was that of an ugly lesbian, I guess that I was wrong.

I wish that there were an organization called "Freedom from Whining Atheists". Atheists, of all people, should love how Godless America is. How exactly are atheists held back in modern America? It's always as if every atheist has been in a time warp and are visiting from 1950's America.

Anonymous said... Notice his education and especially the first paragraph of his career. (2 Timothy 3:13) - Don

Anonymous said...

Speaking of Ronald Reagan, his track record for his children being believers is quite disappointing.

His adopted son, Michael once claimed to be a Christian and has now converted to Roman Catholicism. Ron and Nancy were a devoted couple, but according to reports she consulted mediums.

Anonymous said...

Ron Reagan said in the video that he is not afraid of hell. As if Christians have hell hanging over their heads. Saved Christians are not afraid of hell either. We are afraid for people who are unsaved, and we wish for them to find Jesus as their savior. Atheists may not believe in Jesus, But God still loves them and wishes to give them salvation.

Bible Believer said...

Thanks anon, so many of those celebs look alike!
Yeah she was definitely selected Don, and "disposed" of once she had served her purposes.

Yes still in the churches including the last IFB I was in Reagan was still seen as a "great man". It's scary to see the republican worship still in full vogue. Even the collapse of the economy hasn't woken these people up. With his son being an atheist, their idillyic views of Reagan should vaporize.

Id like to know how atheists are held back too. It's weird. Maybe a small town in the middle of the bible belt they may get a few people who don't agree with them but otherwise, what's the problem?

Thanks Don. I wonder if some of the "have a best life now" phonies got to him. Problems of suffering--interesting.

That's right Michael Reagan became a Catholic. Not exactly good results for all that supposed evangelical faith of the Reagans but the church dupes ignore even the fact they all consulted astrologers.

Agree I want atheists to be saved, including Ronald Reagan's son.

Anonymous said...

Maybe those who we think are worshipping the devil, are not?

I'm not sure of any devil worship in the Bible, only mention of it in modern media?

I see them all in the service of the original unholy trinity after the flood - which really started before the flood (I blame Ham for this, maybe I'm wrong?).

Nimrod, Semerimas and Tammuz - aka - Molech (King), Ashteroth (Tower Builder (tower of Babel) (watchtower) (queen of heaven)) and Ba'al (Lord).

Ecclesiastes 1:9 The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.

Joshua 24:14 Now therefore fear the Lord, and serve him in sincerity and in truth: and put away the gods which your fathers served on the other side of the flood, and in Egypt; and serve ye the Lord. 15 And if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.

Doesn't matter where you go, they're always the same old little gods from Genesis 3:5.

Israel, nor anyone else was ever punished for devil worship, it was always idolatry with the Babylonian gods.

Ezekiel 20:7 Then said I unto them, Cast ye away every man the abominations of his eyes, and defile not yourselves with the idols of Egypt: I am the Lord your God. 8 But they rebelled against me, and would not hearken unto me: they did not every man cast away the abominations of their eyes, neither did they forsake the idols of Egypt: then I said, I will pour out my fury upon them, to accomplish my anger against them in the midst of the land of Egypt.

God put the Israelites into slavery in Egypt for idolatry, after He pleaded with them to stop and they ignored Him, then God later rescued them to fulfil His covenants with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob after the time of the punishment.

I also see all of Babylon arising as hatred against God for the flood, with the tower of Babel being built to escape any further flood (not believing God to not send another flood), and what other point would there be in such a tower to reach the heavens than to escape another flood. And today, those who follow, also hate God, and this is their one and only alternative, no matter which derivation of Babylon they may choose, it's all the same, and there is nothing new under the sun.

God told us Babylon would rise again, His enemy that hates Him, and here it is...

Not discounting the devil or satan here, just thinking the idols were never satan idols, they were always Babylonian gods, and that the hidden mysteries of Babylon were to arise again before the end comes.

Bible Believer said...

Baal is basically Satan is he not?

That's what false gods are under different guises, Satan or his demons.

You know how they call the "goddess" different names, its same for the false "gods". all demons or Satan himself.

Anonymous said...

Yes I agree, I cannot keep up with all their gods and we all know who the mother goddess is. Even Paul and our God Himself stated how many gods there were and how ridiculous it was, then look at all the derivations of Babylon to see how many gods they have in Greece, Rome, Egypt, India, China, the Aztecs etc and all the different names for the same gods of the neighbours of Biblical Israel.

Yes, all coming from satan, before and then following after the flood. The entire war between good and evil in this world comes from Genesis 3:15. The term of satanism or devil worship for Babylonian religion however is only a very new concept to label it as such. Who were the gods before the flood and what impact did that have on the creation of Babylonian religion under Nimrod? I do not know, the Bible does not tell me, and neither are there any history books at all about it. If anyone comments on this interpretation of pre-flood and post-flood gods past what the Scripture says, they are only guessing.

The followers of the Babylonian religion have always believed their gods were the real gods and the God of the Bible false, or wicked and evil. Whereas under this new system operating today, another new sect has arrived naming itself satanists or devil worshippers, who acknowledge the God of the Bible is real and that they are now in the service and worship of the enemy of God., IE saten. Same false gods, same originator of false gods, just a different slant on the names and motivations of the false gods. Which this modern interpretation began with Madame Blavatsky and Aleister Crowley.