Thursday, August 13, 2015
Are Nuclear Bombs Real?
Warning: On this one I have not made up my mind. This could be disinfo but I have wondered about some of these issues. It bothers me that one guy that has made a lot of "nuclear weapons are a myth" videos named Eric Dubay teaches David Icke -like New Age thinking at his blog Atlantean Conspiracy.
This is a thinking aloud post. Feel free to disagree or say you believe nuclear bombs are definitely real. Maybe some will think I am crazy to even post this but as I have said, it's an issue my mind is not made up on. It's a complex issue, some even believe that scripture itself in Revelation seem to believe that the "earth being burned by fire" is the result of nuclear bombs. I believe God doesn't need human help in anything but they point to this verse:
Revelation 8:6And the seven angels which had the seven trumpets prepared themselves to sound.
7 The first angel sounded, and there followed hail and fire mingled with blood, and they were cast upon the earth: and the third part of trees was burnt up, and all green grass was burnt up.
8 And the second angel sounded, and as it were a great mountain burning with fire was cast into the sea: and the third part of the sea became blood;
However that is only conjecture. Obviously Wormwood and more is part of that picture and God's wrath on the earth.
Science is not my strongest suit, though I know more of medicine and biology then I do of physics. There is ample evidence to me that the scientific world is "owned" and they have advanced many things as gospel truth according to the scientific method that are NOT. Some may think I have been reading too much of Clues Forum, but I questioned people ever having gone to the moon and other advances in "science". We know that evolution is a ruse.
Nuclear weapons seem to work all too well in my opinion in keeping the populace afraid and malleable. Ever since the 1950s they have had most Americans shaking in their boots. I remember even the Cold War with Reagan as the puppet at the helm and how we were warned about being on the edge of nuclear devastation. Radiation especially being invisible is an easy scare tactic. With radiation they can tell people to evacuate from something that they can't see, feel or hear. How much of what is happening at Fukishima is real? Oddly I still know people traveling to Japan and Tokyo which is downwind of the place and they don't seem to care. That really boggles my mind. Supposedly Fukishima is killing the whole Pacific Ocean but a city just 100-150 miles away is just fine?
The people who examine the videos seem to have some real questions about the integrity of nuclear bomb videos realities. One of my newest hobbies is photography, and while I am simply an amateur, if all that heat, light and energy is being poured out how do they get those perfect videos of mushroom clouds? Even with space I have asked how can a rocket operate in a vacuum when there is nothing to push against?
The camera itself would be overwhelmed by the light that is so strong it is supposed to burn out human retinas immediately. Years ago I went to a college lecture where they had someone there who had worked on the invention of nuclear bombs. He either was part of the Manhattan project or knew people who were. He was old enough to have been a young man there. This is one time where I felt spiritual darkness in the room, I kept thinking, "That man is lying." and he gave me the willies. I kept thinking what kind of monsters wanting to invent weapons that could blow up the whole world?
One thing to think about and this is a question I had the other day....is how come Hiroshima isn't still a cesspool of radiation. I remember being told some forms of radiation have a half life of thousands of years, and here we see modern Hiroshima and no one is dead from lingering radiation? The city functions like normal after being nuked?
From an article on nuclear bombs:
"Probably the most serious threat is cesium-137, a gamma emitter with a half-life of 30 years. It is a major source of radiation in nuclear fallout, and since it parallels potassium chemistry, it is readily taken into the blood of animals and men and may be incorporated into tissue. Other hazards are strontium-90, an electron emitter with a half-life of 28 years, and iodine-131 with a half-life of only 8 days. Strontium-90 follows calcium chemistry, so that it is readily incorporated into the bones and teeth, particularly of young children who have received milk from cows consuming contaminated forage. Iodine-131 is a similar threat to infants and children because of its concentration in the thyroid gland. In addition, there is plutonium-239, frequently used in nuclear explosives. A bone-seeker like strontium-90, it may also become lodged in the lungs, where its intense local radiation can cause cancer or other damage.
Plutonium-239 decays through emission of an alpha particle (helium nucleus) and has a half-life of 24,000 years. To the extent that hydrogen fusion contributes to the explosive force of a weapon, two other radionuclides will be released: tritium (hydrogen-3), an electron emitter with a half-life of 12 years, and carbon-14, an electron emitter with a half-life of 5,730 years. Both are taken up through the food cycle and readily incorporated in organic matter."
Here is an article on cancer in Hiroshima.
They have more liver cancer but less breast cancer.
Where were all the blind Japanese in decades past that should have been blinded by the blast?
So there are many things that do not add up to me.
Have you ever wondered why all the bombs make Mushroom clouds? Why is it a mushroom? Here I even think of the Amanita Muscaria mushroom? Ok maybe my mind is going too out there. But it's always bugged me the things are pictured as giant mushroom clouds.
The Atomic Bomb Hoax