Tuesday, April 7, 2015

A Name Christian Zionists Would Love

"Better late than never. Almost two weeks after her initial due date, Jill Duggar Dillard has given birth to a baby that she and her husband, Derick Dillard, named Israel David. The newest addition to the Duggar brood weighs 9 lbs, 10 oz. and arrived at 11:49 pm on April 6. "So thankful to God for this handsome little guy!," Jill captioned a photo of her new baby on Instagram."

For years I have written on this blog that the Duggars are being used for propaganda and are part of the false NWO right wing programming. That theory has only grown. I am glad mother and baby are healthy but notice Baby Dillard's new name of Israel? That wouldn't be as bad but there is a reason that Derrick Dillard is wearing an Israel Defense Forces T-shirt with it's Star of David logo. Why would a Christian wear the military logo of a nation they don't even live in and one made of mostly unbelievers? Sure Israel has the right to defend itself as any other nation but you see there the errors that Christian Zionism has led people into.

 With the build up to WWIII in the mix, and the Iran nuclear controversy this week, there could be a reason this baby is named Israel and why his father is wearing an IDF T-shirt, to sell the new wars to come to American Christians and deceive them into believing that these new wars will be God's will and deception for the counterfeit kingdom.

12 comments:

Kayfabe said...

Yeah this whole Christian obsession with putting Israel on some lucky charm pedastol is a huge turn off for me. It's like they think just because they are Jews that they dont need to repent and be born again. Maybe im a jerk but upon hearing the name I wanted to put my finger in my mouth. Not that the name.is bad in and of itself but its this infatuation with all things Israel that's gone too far.

Anonymous said...

Yes I see the deception. Similar to Duck Dynasty.
They put someone in the media, then they portray them to the word as Christians, but they are really zionists.
The democrats label the republicans as Christians, but republicans are not Christians, they are zionists
The democrats can't tell the difference, nor do they care. All a liberal perceives is a very simplistic "religion is stupid" attitude.
When I called omegaman radio show and explained how the 70th week of Daniel is fulfilled, and not future.
And that the future 70th week was a dispensationaist doctrine, which went hand in hand with zionism.
It was like the antichrist spirit came out of the host, then he cut me off and started bearing false witness.
A favorite tactic of christian zionist liars is to call the truth
repacement theology. What they are really saying is that they don't believe the New Testament replaced the Old Testament.
So when someone gets on a show like that, and tells the truth, the host lost his mind.
Also most christian zionists seem really ignorant, and not too bright. They don't understand the terms being used. I have never seen someone who accuses people of replacement theology actually define what they mean.
So the deception is the media puts zionists on tv and sells them to the public as Christians. Then the democrats react to these characters, like Pat Robertson and associate religion with these zionist republicans.
The liberals don't care if their poiticians are zionists or not. Liberals don't think very deeply,only surface level.
Their goal is to mock the faith. They don't really care about human rights. Liberals only react to an issue when it advances their political agenda.

Bible Believer said...

Kayfabe, I am turned off with the worship of Israel the secular nation. Just as corrupt as any nation on this earth. Such people don't even seem to understand the realities of this world. Why is the IDF better then any other Army? Him wearing that shirt almost says he believes it is "God's Army". Many Zionists do believe as Hagee [not all] that Jews do not need Jesus to be saved.

Bible Believer said...

Yes it is the same as Duck Dynasty. I agree they are really Zionists though the word I often use on this blog is DOMINIONISTS. [the terms overlap do they not?] I've been called a replacement theologist too, and in my case, I do believe much of Revelation is to be in the future, but I've been down that road with them. If you do not love the secular state of Israel, some will give you that title automatically. Sure they play the other side of the wing of the bird of Babylon. [False Right and False Left using each other to take everyone into the ditch] Liberals don't care about human rights, or freedom or civil rights. Even their would be stance of being anti-war has been vaporized by Obama.

TruthVigilantee said...

Totally, the Israel stuff gets put on the pedestal and replaces the church, the Lord, you name it. It's like they want to turn believers into soldiers on puppet strings for their zionist agenda. Everyone needs Jesus to be saved, Jews, Gentiles, all of us, period. Hagee is a wolf.

Without getting into my outline of the end times and all of that, I find it interesting to note the following facts:

1. In Revelation, Jerusalem is referred to as 'sodom and egypt, where our Lord was crucified'. Google term and location in Rev. will appear.
2. The 2 prophets/witnesses of God are hated, persecuted, and finally killed off after a long attempt to kill them, when they die people celebrate, and all this takes place in Jerusalem but includes the world as well.

No one ever mentions these facts. So it's not some 'godly' place. I believe God has a plan for them in the end and some get saved, but it's not our job to focus on Israel. I see so much of that and it's gut wrenching how gullible some believers are.
D :{

Anonymous said...

“Matthew 10:5-6 These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”

“Matthew 15:24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”

Hagee and the others of his ilk don’t have a leg to stand on.

Joel

Anonymous said...

My Grandfather is what they call a "Messianic Jew". Most of them believe that Jews do not need Jesus to be saved or be in right standing with God. According to Grandpa he believes that the Old Testament and New Testament are merged together and that Jews don't really have to believe the Gospel to be saved even though both Old and New testaments state that the Jew must believe on Jesus as a commandment of God (Deut 18:18-19, John 3:17-18, I John 3:22-23.

Anonymous said...

There were two strong and powerful women in our church whose speech was as smooth and convincing. They traveled some distance to "sit under" a rabbi's teaching on Friday evenings. The fruits of such indoctrination took form in the church reversing back into Old Testament theology. They invited a woman to come into the church to host a seder meal and we were pressured by these busy body, manipulative women into attending their jewish meal. And when we chose not to attend, for the turnout was lower than expected, we were shamed and made to feel guilty for not attending their prescribed meeting. Such abuse!

One of the women taught a "blood moon" Bible study using John Hagee's book as her primary resource. She is also heavily involved in numerology seeking "hidden codes" within Old Testament Scriptures. And she is not easily corrected, for she has a strong personality whose conscience has been seared and feels bad about nothing, especially in leading God's sheep astray.

And when I asked one of the women if this rabbi they sit under has accepted Jesus as his LORD and Savior, and teaches and preaches His truths, her immediate response was "No, he hasn't accepted Jesus, but he knows god better than we do." And yet, she makes us feel guilty for not listening to her jewish presentations and studies.....boasting of they fact they do not eat pork, etc.

Is it possible these women/people will welcome the man of perdition when the temple is rebuilt the defilement becomes complete?

I am sorry, but I cannot sit under these women, nor those who choose to follow them, for their guilt laden ways are not of our LORD Jesus Christ. May God forgive us.

Bible Believer said...

To the last three commenters thanks for your posts, yes this is a major error that is spreading. Those who deny the son are following the antichrist. They do not have the Father. So anyone claiming a Rabbi who rejects Jesus Christ knows god better then we do has lost the plot long ago. They are as lost as any other members of mystery babylon. Even if some know parts of scripture or preach some moral ethics, this does not mean they are born again or brothers and sisters in Christ. I think many of these people are ready and prepped to embrace the antichrist.

Anonymous said...

Thank-you Bible Believer for your comment. And yes, the women, and the church they represent is very "moral" on the surface, calling out the sins of certain individuals that are indispensable. However, the greatest hypocrisy lives, rules, and reigns in these "moralist churches" MORE than others, for the sins of the pastor and his family, the sins of the leadership and their families, and the sins of those who present themselves "more spiritual on the surface" and are "yes men and women to the leadership" are covered up, with great lengths taken to keep their sins hidden and held "in secret" from the rest of us "horrible and rotten sinners." We are made to feel guilty and led to believe we are headed for hell if we don't do this or do that according to the man made religion from these religious types and shadows.

Moralist churches, yes! Repentant and humble churches, no! Pride rules the hearts and minds of the moralist church systems.

Bible Believer said...

I agree. False leaders parade themselves around as "sinless" and the self righteousness gets worse and worse. Those who pound on the rules turn many away from the gospel.

I forgot to mention to above anon, yes the existence of the two witnesses crying out and then murdered, in Jerusalem [of this earth] does not point to their false holy Israel Utopia.

Bible Believer said...

Speaking of Jill Duggar Dillard, she just had a very harsh labor, and needed a C-section. Here the false Gothard "morality" will be a definite Phariseeical burden. I hope some common sense reigns with her and her husband, not everyone else is made to have 19 children. Michelle Duggar obviously shortened breast feeding to get pregnant as often as possible.