Tuesday, January 13, 2015

Obama Declares War on "Extremists"

Two more years of Obama.....wonder if the nation will still be standing?

The other party of course is no good either.

Obama Declares War on "Extremists"

"Do you know what an “extremist” is?  In the wake of the horrible terror attacks on the offices of Charlie Hebdo in France, Barack Obama is speaking very boldly about the need to win the war against “extremists”, and he has announced plans to host a major global summit on “extremism” next month.  And on the surface that sounds great.  But precisely how are we supposed to determine whether someone is an “extremist” or not?  What criteria should we use?"

1. Those that talk about “individual liberties”
2. Those that advocate for states’ rights
3. Those that want “to make the world a better place”
4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”
5. Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”
6. Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”
7. Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable”
8. Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”
9. Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals”
10. “Anti-Gay”
11. “Anti-Immigrant”
12. “Anti-Muslim”
13. “The Patriot Movement”
14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”
15. Members of the Family Research Council
16. Members of the American Family Association
17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union’”
18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol
19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform
20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition
21. Members of the Christian Action Network
22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”
23. Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”
24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21
25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps
26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations”
27. The militia movement
28. The sovereign citizen movement
29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”
30. Anyone that “complains about bias”
31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”
32. Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”
33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs”
34. Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views”
35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”
36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”
37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”
38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”
39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”
40. “Militia or unorganized militia”
41. “General right-wing extremist”
42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.
43. Those that refer to an “Army of God”
44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”
45. Those that are “anti-global”
46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”
47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”
48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”
49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”
50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”
51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”
52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”
53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”
54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”
55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”
56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”
57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”
58. “Rightwing extremists”
59. “Returning veterans”
60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration”
61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”
62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling”
63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”
64. “Anti-abortion activists”
65. Those that are against illegal immigration
66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner
67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations
68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”
69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr
70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)
71. Those that believe in “end times” prophecies
72. Evangelical Christians"

The above list is from the economic collapse blog, obviously some of the groups and politicians he lists are false.

Hmm that is quite a list. How many apply to me? How many apply to you, my reader? There are many I disagree with but many that would apply.  How many millions of Americans would these apply to? Notice they want to persecute for BELIEFS now not BEHAVIOR. So PEACEFUL people who don't think the "right" thoughts are on the chopping block". I have to go look up what the deal is with the GLOBAL "extremist" global summit. Notice the set up and the focus on Christian persecution. Of course keep in mind the NWO controls the "right wing" too, economic collapse blog has many good articles, but there's a few blind spots,  it's kind of funny that Knights of Malta heavy Family Research Council makes the list.


Faith Guy said...

Yes, Tony Perkins(Family Research Council head) will likely lead his flock to the gas chamber.

As well as the heads of some of these other "patriot" groups like Ron Paul and Chuck Baldwin(their fellow "patriot" flocks, that is).

TruthVigilantee said...

Hmmm-hm. Some of those are bizarre, but others hit me like a bullseye, many.

They are going to 'outlaw' extremist forms of religion in the name of their 'common ground' and their target is true Christians. War on terror, etc. but that's what it all comes down to.

Ironically, the visual they give you is a circle with some tangent branches extending way out there, like the fanatics out on a limb. But the reality is that, suppose it's a circle. Radical islam is not radical. Islam teaches to execute unbelievers. That is what they are doing. That is not an extreme, that is core islam. It is like the center on the circle. The peaceful ones would be those along the circumference. The spectrum is the radius. With Christians, the lukewarm ones would be the circumference (there are more of them too...) and the serious ones are at the center. They are practicing true Christianity (anti-abortion, etc.). So the extremes are not outside, but at the center of each circle. But they have inverted it so that anyone 'extreme' is seen as an outsider while the lukewarm types who blend in anywhere are put at the core. Extreme is villified while mellow casual types are extolled. They will take this part of each religion in a superimposed overlap (the intersection in a venn diagram) and call it the common ground. If you don't comply and conform... it will be the chopping block. That's where it's all going. There is so much talk with their anti-terror plans that point in this direction.

In case anyone is wondering, yes. I'm an extremist. I... am a solid Christian, loyal to the one and only true God, won't compromise in any way, go by the bible, love my enemies, and am willing to lay down my life for my faith. Very dangerous for sure!

I saw a cartoon somewhere that had a drawing of two extremists, a muslim and a Christian. The muslim said 'I must kill you if you don't convert' and the Christian said 'I must preach the gospel even if I lose my life and I can't convert even to save my life but must die for my faith'

Very different concepts of extreme; sacrificial love and selfish hate and murder.

Anonymous said...

truth vigilante-

Are you aka Victoria diagnello / mary white / lilianna white ?

Anonymous said...

LOL truth vigilante became a blogger on December 19 right when Victoria had "her" xmas melt down. nice coincidence

Bible Believer said...

What did Truth Vigilante post that bothered you?

Please deal with the ideas. I can't go hunting after posters, as to who is real or not. I already wrote a board like this probably already has some astroturfers. Please deal with the ideas presented.

Victoria supported Christmas right? Well I posted against that.

I agree about Tony Perkins and Chuck Baldwin.

If you haven't seen this post about Chuck Baldwin please read.


Anonymous said...

What did Truth Vigilante post that bothered you?

it doesn't bother you ? that some Vatican bot is settling in amongst the brethren by posting on yours and other sites for some time? always changing identity and ignoring questions. Maybe if you actually thought about the endgame.

You're all so naïve it hurts. I wont say anything anymore K? carry on

Anonymous said...

Bible Believer,
It is coming to pass within the 501c. 3 church system, that if a true, born again believer and follower of Jesus Christ, does not embrace and embody the old covenant laws, that one is labeled as "unsaved and a swine (the casting your pearls before swine Scripture is used here in labeling the born again believer as a swine for not following the 613 Laws of Moses......insidiously deceitful here)"......

so President Obama may be indoctrinating through the front door, but many within the 501c. 3 are falsely leading people into hell through the back door.....and these same wolves cannot and do not follow even God's two greatest commands to Love Him and Love Thy Neighbor......for they claim to love God.....and yet "truly hate their neighbor."

I don't fear President Obama, but many within the church are more evil than he.......beware of the tares....