Monday, September 17, 2012

Obama Defends the NDAA

The Obama Administration Says It's Unconstitutional To Strike Down The NDAA

Notice the double-talk here? The NDAA itself is unconstitutional which is why one judge is standing against it. Pray for that judge! Remember Romney supports the NDAA as well.

"The Obama administration had some harsh words Friday after a federal judge appointed by Obama appointee said the government doesn't have a right to indefinitely detain anyone even remotely associated with terrorist groups.

Judge Katherine B. Forrest permanently blocked the government from enforcing the National Defense Authorization Act, claiming it was too vague and would have a "chilling effect" on free speech.

And now the Department of Justice is calling Forrest's ruling "unprecedented," arguing that the government has long had the authority to detain anyone it deems a threat to the county, The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog reported Friday.

Forrest's ruling oversteps the court's authority and infringes on Obama's power to act as Commander in Chief, according to the government's court filings.

The Justice Department requested a stay of the ruling pending appeal, which Forrest denied Friday.

Carl Mayer, an attorney for the plaintiffs in the case has hailed the decision as a "huge and historic victory for democracy," saying he believes any challenges from the Obama administration will be shot down, RT reported over the weekend."
See: "While Americans Shopped, the Constitution Was Shredded"

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Finally a Judge who can see this issue for what it really is, and your right about praying for her. If the Supreme Court would do their job then this nonsense would have been thrown out as the Patriot Act. Marbury vs Madison 1803 - Don