Saturday, August 13, 2011

Pepsi Using Aborted Fetal Cells In Flavor Enhancers?

This is really really gross. I almost feel like throwing up having drank a Pepsi just yesterday. I try and limit soda, but have an occasional one.

"Pepsi Uses Aborted Fetal Cells in Flavor Enhancers"

"Pepsi is using aborted baby cells to develop flavor enhancers"


It also needs more research, so as to the validity of the claims, that is why I have put a question mark in the title. If anything any involvement with companies using aborted fetuses for flavor enchancers is beyond sickening and luciferian to the core.

There are a lot of "pro-life" groups including the Catholic website Lifesite, that are warning about this.

Scores of prolife groups are calling for a public boycott of food giant, PepsiCo, due to its partnership with Senomyx, a biotech company that uses aborted fetal cells in the research and development of artificial flavor enhancers.

LifeSiteNews previously reported on Senomyx’s partnership with major food corporations, most notably PepsiCo, Kraft Foods, and NestlĂ©.

Pro-life watchdog group, Children of God for Life (CGL), is now joined by major pro-life organizations calling upon the public to target PepsiCo in a boycott.

Pepsi is funding the research and development, and paying royalties to Senomyx, which uses HEK-293 (human embryonic kidney cells) to produce flavor enhancers for Pepsi beverages.

“Using isolated human taste receptors we created proprietary taste receptor-based assay systems that provide a biochemical or electronic readout when a flavor ingredient interacts with the receptor,” says the Senomyx website.

“What they do not tell the public is that they are using HEK 293 – human embryonic kidney cells taken from an electively aborted baby to produce those receptors,” stated Debi Vinnedge, President for CGL, the watch dog group that has been monitoring the use of aborted fetal material in medical products and cosmetics for years.

The aborted fetal cells are not in the product itself. However, “there are many options PepsiCo could be using instead of aborted fetal cells,” noted Vinnedge.

The revelation about Senomyx’s research techniques motivated Campbell Soup to sever all relations with Senomyx.
Here is an article from 2009, that talks about Semomyx's use of fetal material [well dead baby body parts--let's not mince words] to make more phony "good-tasting" food.

Who on earth woke up on day, and decided instead of using other foods, and spices thought that cannibalism was a good idea for research for "flavor enhancers"?

I'm sorry if I grossed anyone out with this article, I know this subject needs more researched just posting information from elsewhere, but I knew all along that very bad things were being done to our food. People need to know. There are things about abortion that are so horrifying, that it would take time to even discuss on this blog, one of those things being that they SELL the aborted babies. To me this is more proof about the horrors of what is being done to the human population by the totally evil.

5 comments:

Moses Model said...

I am not sure that using a cell line from a 1970's Dutch fetus counts as dead baby parts. One, the cell line is older than many people I know. Two, "parts" suggests organs and at most these cells may qualify as tissues. Three, it is not aborted babies, it is baby singular. This is one baby, 40 years ago, that their cells harvested and sold around the world. Four, this is not cannibalism, because the cells are not consumed. They merely let the researcher know how their experiment is progressing, so they do not have to taste it themselves.

Harvesting cells is controversial even when they are harvested from a living person. One need only to look at the HELA cell issue. However the cells that were obtained from aborted babies in the 60's and 70's were obtained from children that were already marked for generally unjust death. Their cells live on in several countries and are sold on the open market.

As tragic as the circumstances were that the cells were originally obtained 40 years ago, I am not convinced the guilt can be transferred to the lab tech that uses the cells or Pepsi.

You might be interested in this statement from the Vatican on the use of fetal cells in vaccines.
http://www.immunize.org/concerns/vaticandocument.htm

Bible Believer said...

Bible Believer said...
Well it's from an orginal aborted baby, and honestly even if the cells were grown anew from an original, it still has that element of grossness to it. I mean why are things being flavored or experimented with being flavored by some hyper-stem cell that orginated from an aborted baby? Why use them at all? Also if it is not going to be one day consumed why would they use it in the experiments at all. I haven't had time to post on some really gross stuff being done in our labs, so I do not condone everything done in the name of science. There are horrors being done with our labs especially the bioengineering labs...read this article..They are doing things against God, who in Genesis, made each animal etc, "after it's own kind". If there is any reason for God to end this world soon beyond the usual human wickedness, this would be a top-runner as offense to His creation.

http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/part-humanpart-animal-hybrid-monsters-are-being-created-by-scientists-all-over-the-planet

With Pepsi alone, the aspartame alone is poisoning many people.

I think many of these labs are engaged in many evils...our food is becoming adulterated especially in America, and we are becoming more immersed in a vat of toxic stew. Just the fact a lab has to use aborted baby cells--grown over 40 years ups the grossness and unnatural factor.

As for the Vatican's statements on anything, their support of Monsanto, shows they are working on behalf of evil in the world and control over the world's resources.

Before I go read the link you have provided, I am going to guess that the Vatican has approved the use of 40 year old cells...[thus opening the door for abuses, while still playing the prolife card on the surface]

Looks like I was right...

"It concerns vaccines containing live viruses which have been prepared from human cell lines of foetal origin, using tissues from aborted human foetuses as a source of such cells. The best known, and perhaps the most important due to its vast distribution and its use on an almost universal level, is the vaccine against Rubella (German measles)."


I went and go read that, I didn't realize even the rubella vacinnations were made [originally] from aborted fetuses, but I found my eyes kind of glaze over as they did the Jesuit casuistry thing over formal vs. passive cooperation.

I used to think the claim of vaccinations all being connected to abortions, was 'another conspiracy theory" one I didn't yet research to see if it was true, guess I learn a new thing everyday, as that one turned out to be true.

Is there a reason they have to use dead babies for everything? I mean there are lots of people who die naturally and donate their bodies to science, just something I am mulling over with this one.

Bible Believer said...

Oh here is the Vatican and Monsanto link...

Read in the comments...

http://galatiansfour.blogspot.com/2011/06/monsanto-trying-to-take-over-world-seed.html

Moses Model said...

The fetal cell lines have special properties that they have not been able to successfully duplicate in other lines. Also, the first immortal cell line was not created until 1951. Again I do not think that the Vatican has convinced me that there is an intrinsic evil in using cell lines from aborted fetuses. The body of the baby has long since died. Their cells live on around the world.

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/Henrietta-Lacks-Immortal-Cells.html

Senomyx is using HEK 239 as a taste tester, so they do not have to manually taste their concoctions. The samples with HEK 239 or any human cells are not consumed.

These animal/human hybrid embryos are scary. However I am not sure that the Bible forbids their creation. God separating things was once used as a prohibition against miscegenation. Just because God separated things, does not mean that it is unethical to bring them together. The ethical dilemma is when do these hybrids have souls? Will souled hybrids be treated as unsouled? If they have a soul, what responsibility do we have with the gospel.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0388_0001_ZO.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/animals/using/hybridembryos_1.shtml

As far as animals with human organs, there is really no difference with this and antivenom. Antivenom is animal antibodies that are from an animal that is immune to the particular venom. There is very little difference between using animal blood and animal organs.

Do you have evidence that aspartame is poisoning people?
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/artificial-sweeteners#3

Finally the Vatican is right. Vaccines save so many lives, being prolife mandates vaccinations.

Bible Believer said...

Are you a scientist of some sort?

The Vatican seemed to be defending the use of these cell lines, in that document, not the opposite.

Anyhow using when we clear away all the rhetoric, lets cut to the chase here, you and I know, that they originally used aborted babies, and there is nothing good about that at all. This would of course mean that aborted babies are being used NOW for NEW TESTS. Few know it but they bag up aborted babies to sell to labs all over and it's still happening now.

http://www.nrlc.org/Baby_Parts/NE_research.html

I mean let's think this one out, not only is this country engaging in the murder of millions of babies, those baby's dead bodies are being sold to researchers and used. So I am not going to play around here, and make excuses for what was total evil at the start.

Even if the dead baby parts are used only as a "taste tester", doesn't matter, it is still sickening.

The Bible DOES forbid the creation of animal human hybrids.

The satanic Catholic church will defend this...

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article1993579.ece

But the Bible says otherwise, do you not even see the BEASTIALITY aspects of all this?

***************************

"The Bible says that God requires humans, animals, and plants to reproduce "after their own kind." Species integrity was therefore required by God. Transgenics not only violates this order but opens a Pandora's box to a potential molecular nightmare.

Transgenics may also violate Biblical laws concerning bestiality (sex between humans and animals). Leviticus 18:23 says "it is confusion," and the punishment for participating in such intercourse was death. The Hebrew word confusion (tebel) means a "violation of nature or of God's divine order."

The Levitical code therefore surpasses the physical act of intercourse and speaks to the issue of 'confusion' of the species. By this standard transgenically altered humans are no longer human at all. In fact, they are indefinable, because introducing animal genes into human DNA creates an unclassified mutation outside the 'divine order.'"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All races are of one blood--Acts 17 so that issue doesn't even enter into here. It is a distractive issue. Human beings of different colors according to the Bible are of "one blood" and same species contrary to all the racists out there.

Act 17:26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;

So it is unethical to mix human and animal blood, when you get right down to it, is beastiality. I do not believe they will have souls. Read Leviticus.

Those who follow the gospel understand that many of the world's scientists are under the leading of the luciferians and satanic new world order system.

Antivenom doesn't produce an animal human hybrid. Medicines made from animal products, is different. When someone drinks a glass of milk, they do not become half a cow. LOL

There is tons of research on aspartame out there, do some research beyond the official avenues. I have seen for myself the affects of aspartme and other additives to food. Also look up Splenda and Chlorine.

I think some vaccinations served a purpose, but many now are being used in a negative fashion. The NWO wants population control, of that there is no doubt. Do you remember the bird flu vaccinations and all the reported health problems.

http://thebirdflupandemic.com/archives/h1n1-swine-flu-vaccine-insert-admits-it-causes-guillain-barre-syndrome-vasculitis-paralysis-anaphylactic-shock-and-death

Many have been indoctrinated to defend the mad scientists in the name of "progress". I am not one of those people.